3 ms·
That last paragraph is self contradictory. If they had grounds on copyright law, then they must have been able to legally copyright their dresses regardless of
by stonemetal12 3y ago
That last paragraph is self contradictory. If they had grounds on copyright law, then they must have been able to legally copyright their dresses regardless of whether or not they actually went to court. If you can't copyright a dress then they had no grounds under copyright law.
As far as I am aware you can't copyright a dress, unless it is like the banana that got nailed to the wall as art. The most relevant thing would be a design patent.
- PrimeMcFly 3y ago> If you can't copyright a dress then they had no grounds under copyright law. Copyright is automatic and they may have just been hoping/assuming it replies. I should have said they may have thought they had grounds under copyright law.