> I'd be surprised if humans are going to be competitive with generative AI for much longer. You're right, it does read like poorly written fan fiction. Like

> I'd be surprised if humans are going to be competitive with generative AI for much longer. You're right, it does read like poorly written fan fiction. Like I said, humans are currently competitive with generative AI. I suspect they won't be for much longer. > I'm not really sure how this translates to the death of the entertainment industry. Implicit in my comment is the assumption that AI will continue to improve from here. There is a clear curve forming in what generative AI is capable of. For me to be correct, the curve holds for long enough that AI becomes a compelling story teller given user guidance/input along with corresponding stable generation of assets. Given the poor fan fiction above is substantially better than where we were 5 years ago with generative AI, I think it's a pretty safe bet to say if we keep following that curve it'll become a pretty good dungeon master that can lead a quest in a meaningful number of worlds.