4 ms·

if only we could trust people to make informed decisions..

• tarboreus 3y ago
  About what to censor.
• bigstrat2003 3y ago
  Whether or not people are worthy of the trust, we must place it in them.
  • jfengel 3y ago
    Not when they can't be trusted not to kill, harass, or beat people. And it really doesn't do us any good to go tsk-tsk after they've done so.
    • bigstrat2003 3y ago
      If there's someone we can't trust to kill/harass/assault people, they need to be in prison, not having speech policed for them as if they were a child. That's one of the core purposes of imprisonment, in fact. But the reality is that we can, in fact, trust most people to not do those things. And yes, that means sometimes we will be wrong and we will have to pick up the pieces after someone does something awful. That is simply part and parcel of living in a free society.
      • jfengel 3y ago
        The people being threatened disagree with you. They aren't living in a free society. They are forced to protect themselves, both in real life and online. Personally, I'd be in favor of enforcing existing laws about threats. Make a death threat, go to jail. Law enforcement is pretty bad at that, with the excuse that most death threats turn into action, and it's very difficult to track down an anonymous commenter. But I'd like to see what would happen if they took the existing laws seriously. Maybe then I'd find it easier to credit the notion of unrestricted free speech that doesn't rise to the level of criminality. I'm not convinced, but I'd at least be able to consider it. Meantime, "Somebody threatened to kill you and that's your problem until you're actually dead" does not seem like an acceptable situation.
• _chu1 3y ago
  Telling a random person you don't know that you know exactly what's good for them is dumb