You fail for assuming future $1000 computer will be transistor based. You're also being disingenuous in stating that every neuron contributes to a human's know

You fail for assuming future $1000 computer will be transistor based. You're also being disingenuous in stating that every neuron contributes to a human's knowledge, that there is no overlap of knowledge between humans, and creating a computer with equivalent human knowledge requires a 1 to 1 mapping of neurons to thingers(say transistors, but could be quantum gate whatcha-ma-callits).