>It’s also arrogant to believe you are an honest arbiter of what crosses the line. Once again, this is removing the nuance of the issue. I don't think anyone

>It’s also arrogant to believe you are an honest arbiter of what crosses the line. Once again, this is removing the nuance of the issue. I don't think anyone would say it is arrogant to suggest that child porn crosses the line into bad speech. And to be clear, I'm not trying to draw the line myself. I am asking that we have an open debate about that line. It is the free speech absolutists that are taking the arrogant position by refusing the debate and establishing that line themselves.