3 ms·
That degree generally being the fine line between "none" and "some". The simple act of holding the camera, even if you don't really know where you are pointing
by sandworm101 3y ago
That degree generally being the fine line between "none" and "some". The simple act of holding the camera, even if you don't really know where you are pointing it, can qualify resulting images for copyright protection. But is the monkey at the zoo grabs your camera and snaps a pic, no copyright for anyone. So for an AI-generated song, a court will probably be able to hang its hat on the smallest of human input in the lyric or musical process.
- kube-system 3y agoYou're confusing different concepts: "qualification for copyright eligibility" (what you're referring to) and "qualification for fair use" and "qualification for (un)authorized use of likeness/personality" ... are all different things, with different laws, and different standards.