> The problem is the "intelligence" word causes more harm than value. By this measure "learning" could be inaccurate too. Does a human learn if they just commi

> The problem is the "intelligence" word causes more harm than value. By this measure "learning" could be inaccurate too. Does a human learn if they just commit something to memory? Programming is chalk full of people who know the code but haven't "learned" to program. Intrinsically we all know there's something deeper to learning than just memorizing or retaining to memory. I think GP has a point. Marketing terms are to the benefit of the user to be relatable, whether accurate or not. We can and, to my knowledge, historically do retain the stories of what the correlation of a marketing term versus its actual technology is.