4 ms·
Restricting publishing videos of world changing events, which make it clear what actually happened, is the opposite of free speech. Publishing videos of others
by yostrovs 3y ago
Restricting publishing videos of world changing events, which make it clear what actually happened, is the opposite of free speech. Publishing videos of others commiting acts of violence is not inciting violence. Please read 1984 to help prevent changes in meanings of words.
- sergiosgc 3y agoWhat about restricting publishing of false videos of world changing events? Because that's what the EU is railing about...
- tekla 3y agoWell, have fun defining "false" in a meaningfully fast way
- sergiosgc 3y agoThe EU Commission letter has a few examples. Easy enough for a moderation team to spot, if there was a moderation team in place. Complaining that it is difficult is no reason to skip moderation altogether.
- burnished 3y agoRepurposed footage from other wars or video games was called out in the letter, seems like a fast and uncontroversial definition of false.
- lm28469 3y agoTake all these journalists claiming "40 babies were beheaded" for a start. Even the government of israel denied it It should be fairly easy to "prove" 40 babies have been beheaded What about he "children in cages" ? Repurposed videos from Syria a few years ago, easily debunked, yet it got hundred thousands of views on twitter
- fzeroracer 3y agoSure. False as in fake as in it never happened. Which is what's happening on X and what the EU has examples of.