3 ms·
We don't know what systemic effects the vaccines have because the companies lied and said the vaccines stay at the injection site (aka, therefor they don't need
by linuxftw 3y ago
We don't know what systemic effects the vaccines have because the companies lied and said the vaccines stay at the injection site (aka, therefor they don't need to do more expensive testing).
We also now know that the manufacturing process for some brands was different from the trial groups to general availability, the latter of which contained much more varied biological material.
So, what could a bunch of unpure mRNA, RNA, and DNA strands coated in an immune system-evading 'nano-coating' do to your body? God only knows at this point, we didn't do the science to find out.
- Izkata 3y agoTo downvoters: Point 1 was in a Pfizer document first leaked from Japan's government in mid 2021, officially released a year or more later. Point 2 (ish) was in a footnote in Pfizer's FDA approval notice, there were formulation changes in the inactive ingredients between the EUA and brand version for (IIRC) shelf-life stability. I don't remember details on the exact difference being in there though, and I don't remember differences between the trial and EUA versions (but scaling up can cause this by accident).
- linuxftw 3y agoThanks, I'm not talking about the difference in the EUA and the Approved versions. I'm talking about the clinical trial vs all subsequent versions with regards to how the actual vaccine genetic material was produced. I can't find the reference at the moment, but I believe they used PCR to replicate the mRNA during the trials, and used the bacteria replication for the subsequent versions. Here's a professor giving testimony to his findings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY