4 ms·
I bought a $1200 mirrorless which was supposedly the best in class a couple of years ago. All my photos look like they were shot on a potato compared to my ipho
by olivermuty 3y ago
I bought a $1200 mirrorless which was supposedly the best in class a couple of years ago. All my photos look like they were shot on a potato compared to my iphone.
Not to mention that I don't walk around with that mirrorless camera in my pocket at almost all times.
- baz00 3y agoI spent that and mine don't look like it's shot on a potato. Are you sure you know what you are doing? My Z50 and kit lens fits in my pocket fine.
- olivermuty 3y agoThats the whole point, I don’t know what I am doing.
- baz00 3y agoFix that. Then you have a right to complain :)
- numpad0 3y agoI once asked someone with a nice piece of kit that wasn't too far from mine in cost. They said they sorted top to bottom on DxOMark list and bought one on the top and they didn't even know what a prime is. But that approach seemed to work.
- arein2 3y agoput aperture, iso, focus, shutter speed on auto (if it's not a manual lens) and you will get good pictures
- criley2 3y agoI spent about that on a mirrorless and my photos blow smartphones out of the water. It takes 10x longer to setup, take, and post-process and is a hassle for many reasons, but the photo quality is extremely noticeably better.
- FireBeyond 3y agoHow much did you spend on the lens that went on it? Camera bodies will keep being updated. Glass is updated, but a lot more stable. If I have a friend who wants to invest, say, $3,000 in a camera setup, I'd tell them to get a $1,000 body and $2,000 of lenses. A couple have thought they'd buy a $2,500 body and $500 lens, and I explained why they might be disappointed with that investment.