4 ms·
Who is right? Google: LLMs are already AGI Or me: LLMs are just useful for experts: https://open.substack.com/pub/rakkhi/p/economics-of-large-language-models?
by rakkhi 3y ago
Who is right? Google: LLMs are already AGI
Or me:
LLMs are just useful for experts:
https://open.substack.com/pub/rakkhi/p/economics-of-large-language-models?r=1afqp&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web https://open.substack.com/pub/rakkhi/p/economics-of-large-la...
- creer 3y agoThe fine article addresses most of this. In their terms, you are complaining that this ENIAC of AGI is not performing like a CAD workstation or something. Of course it isn't. The question is not how performant it is, but whether it is AGI - no matter how insufficient for our ideal Jetsonian needs. Your only argument for it not being AGI is "clearly". You'll need to expand on that part.