3 ms·
I tried it on a video I made a few months ago. Here’s the original, in which I speak English: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JUepj7wIl0 https://www.youtube.c
by tkgally 3y ago
I tried it on a video I made a few months ago. Here’s the original, in which I speak English:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JUepj7wIl0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JUepj7wIl0
And here are the first two and a half minutes with me dubbed into Japanese:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z85FXwH6pUU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z85FXwH6pUU
Aside from some pacing problems, the voice and intonation sound quite good to me. But anyone listening to the translation alone would find it hard to follow, as the tool seems to have mistranscribed some of my English and mistranslated some of the rest. (I understand Japanese.)
The dubbing would probably be a lot better if I had spoken English more slowly and with awareness that what I said would be interpreted into another language.
- fennecfoxy 3y agoI think it did pretty well. No offense as your original video is still really great for a native English speaker (me) to listen to, but the English speech varies in pace a lot, sometimes you speak incredibly quickly, at such a pace that you even miss some syllables or blend them together for example https://youtu.be/8JUepj7wIl0?t=194 https://youtu.be/8JUepj7wIl0?t=194 it sounds like you said "technogial" or "technodule" rather than "tech-no-log-ical". So I can understand that a machine may make mistakes on this; don't worry, as a Kiwi I mumble and do this too ha ha. But the Japanese result is still already very very impressive even if I haven't spoken since I was 15 and over there on exchange (and stopped learning once I realise they romanise everything, why label a bottle with appuru jyusu when you have RINGO SHIRU!)