> In terms of housing, the $1000 a month group only improved by 6% more than the $50 group. 6 percentage points more, not 6% more. Kind of a big difference. A

> In terms of housing, the $1000 a month group only improved by 6% more than the $50 group. 6 percentage points more, not 6% more. Kind of a big difference. A 26% increase is 30% more than a 20% increase. Group B has a 75% increase in participants finding housing compared to the control group. > That is to say, even if you just give people enough money every month to get an apartment with a roommate, only 6% will actually use it that way. While that is statistically correct we don't know why it is only used that way 6% of the time. The greater increase in the lump sum group could indicate that the $1k/month group couldn't pay for application fees, deposits, or other upfront costs even if their supplemented income otherwise could sustain the monthly costs of housing.