> reducing reproduction amongst the population that cannot raise children to a standard that is contributing to society. I'm getting major eugenics vibes from

> reducing reproduction amongst the population that cannot raise children to a standard that is contributing to society. I'm getting major eugenics vibes from that comment. I'm not saying you're for forcible population control, but it's just a tiny hop and a skip from the "poor people are so burdened by having children that they just shouldn't" to "poor people are too dumb to realize that they should not have children so we should 'help' them not reproduce".