Not sure how much more I can explain my point of view. I have used ChatGPT 4 for many tasks which require intelligence. Others have too. It worked, many many ti

Not sure how much more I can explain my point of view. I have used ChatGPT 4 for many tasks which require intelligence. Others have too. It worked, many many times. Summarising an unknown text for example requires intelligence. Proving a novel version of a mathematical theorem requires intelligence. Translating natural language into a new logic I just invented requires intelligence. Plenty of testing and evidence here. It also failed many times, but often this was because of inherent ambiguity in the task, which it helped to expose. That's pretty intelligent. The scientific method only works if you accept the evidence. Some people don't believe that we landed on the moon. Well. You are telling me you could not use it for what you would have hoped to use it for, and you are not allowing the use of the term intelligent until an LLM can do that for you. If that is your definition of intelligence, good for you. But I would suggest the following instead: What the scientific method has proven is that, if you feed a very simple mechanism with enough data, then intelligence emerges.