3 ms·
I assume what they are going for is that if they were inversely correlated it would imply that movie piracy drives down box office revenue (since you could say
by Adverblessly 3y ago
I assume what they are going for is that if they were inversely correlated it would imply that movie piracy drives down box office revenue (since you could say "the more pirated a movie is, the lower its box office revenue"). Since they aren't, it implies that piracy does not significantly cause reduced box office revenue.
I've brought it up a few times before, but you can read about another study here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15319476 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15319476 that assuming my previous comment on it was correct found for example that every pirated movie is 0.27 of a lost sale, whereas every pirated video game is actually 0.24 of an extra sale. If 0.27 was actually 1 or more, then a result like the linked study would have been more surprising for example.
- cantSpellSober 3y agoI don't think so, this is a study from a marketing company. This is essentially an ad for their services, which monitor activity on unlicensed sites (I gather): > The combination of Box Office revenue data and unlicensed consumption data would provide a holistic view of film consumption
- Adverblessly 3y agoSorry for being unclear, by "what they are going for" I meant why TorrentFreak chose to post about this study, not why the study was made in the first place.