3 ms·
Well, it requires almost an order of magnitude more energy to serve HTTP/3 than HTTP/1, so maybe? Why do I say this? Because it breaks nearly every optimizati
by drewg123 3y ago
Well, it requires almost an order of magnitude more energy to serve HTTP/3 than HTTP/1, so maybe?
Why do I say this? Because it breaks nearly every optimization that's been made to serve content efficiently over the last 25 years (sendfile, TSO, kTLS, etc), and requires that the server's CPU touch every byte of data multiple times (rather than never, for http/1). Its basically the "what if I do everything wrong" case in my talk here: https://people.freebsd.org/~gallatin/talks/euro2022.pdf https://people.freebsd.org/~gallatin/talks/euro2022.pdf
Given enough time, it may yet get close to HTTP/1. But its still early days.
- juped 3y agono it's more efficient in every way, they called it QUIC not SLO
- giantrobot 3y agoThat's why they don't have data centers in San Luis Obispo.