4 ms·
> assuming that this is "complexity bloat" and not just "a feature that people use" ¿Por qué no los dos? :)
by throw0101c 3y ago
> assuming that this is "complexity bloat" and not just "a feature that people use"
¿Por qué no los dos?
:)
- insanitybit 3y agoWell, to me "bloat" and "useful + used" are incompatible. The feature only made it into HTTP/2 because it saw validation from gRPC, I believe.
- sophacles 3y agoBloat implies that it isn't useful - that it's just dead weight. If a lot of people use the thing, it must provide some value to them.