> No. But the theory is spreading online Great so the economist is telling us with certainty something about the origin of Bitcoin. This seems to be a disinge

> No. But the theory is spreading online Great so the economist is telling us with certainty something about the origin of Bitcoin. This seems to be a disingenuous, agenda-riddled article. Declaring a conclusion up front with certainty, on a topic still not well understood, is anti-intellectual and has no business on hn.