3 ms·
Also changing culture to discourage people from aggregating in hustle and bustle anthills.
by hoseja 3y ago
Also changing culture to discourage people from aggregating in hustle and bustle anthills.
- thfuran 3y agoCities are far more efficient than having everyone smeared across vast swaths of suburbia. And changing culture in a targeted way is not exactly an easy thing to do.
- dukeyukey 3y agoReversing the entire Industrial Revolution seems harder than just building more houses.
- oblio 3y agoThat's a recipe for urban/suburban sprawl and an absolute disaster for the environment. Even low density housing through basic human presence distorts natural environments. It's basically like this in terms of environmental impact: No humans >>>>>>>>>>> a few humans >>> many humans >> enormous amounts of humans.
- harimau777 3y agoI don't think that's possible (other than indirectly such as by improving high speed rail so people can benefit from cities without living there). By their nature cities provide greater access to desirable amenities such as art, culture, museums, and niche hobbies.
- hoseja 3y agoArt, culture, museums, and niche hobbies are only desirable if the culture (other meaning) deems them desirable.