5 ms·
I don't know what the EU chat law thinks of that, I'd have to read the law[1], but no child was abused so it's not CSAM under a "common sense" definition. [1]:
by arp242 3y ago
I don't know what the EU chat law thinks of that, I'd have to read the law[1], but no child was abused so it's not CSAM under a "common sense" definition.
[1]: The definition that the law uses is in Directive 2011/93. In a very quick check it probably would be considered CSAM, but I'd have to read the entire thing to be sure: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32011L0093#d1e516-1-1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...
- pseudalopex 3y agoNo one uses a common sense definition of CSAM. No child was abused if 16 year olds send each other pictures of themselves. But it is child pornography even so. And groups pushing to say CSAM instead of child pornography push for fictional depictions to be criminal also.