3 ms·
I know that there are various strategies for picking pseudo random numbers, but what I mean by determinism is that as far as we can tell, the activation trigger
by RC_ITR 3y ago
I know that there are various strategies for picking pseudo random numbers, but what I mean by determinism is that as far as we can tell, the activation trigger for a neuron is highly dependent on outside signals like hormones. That means that a biological “dot product” will be different if you are tired vs. well rested.
A dot product run on Intel CPUs are intended to always be the same no matter what. The heat signature stuff isn’t changing the way circuits do math.
As to optical illusions, the point I was making was that “the way humans practically perceive something” is not a sufficient way to measure the similarness of two things, since our perceptions are so often tricked (LLMs are literally trained specifically to trick you into thinking you’re talking to sentience).
I also don’t think they are completely unrelated at all. As I said I know we designed one to be like the other. It’s just by no means “the same.” AI may one day do convergent evolution toward how brains think, but it’s still important to recognize that’s convergent evolution.
- nomel 3y agoI see all of this as implementation details of a single biological system that exhibits "thought", not a definition of "thought". > It’s just by no means “the same.” The implementation is not the same. Everyone agrees with that. The concept being compared is "thought", not "implementation of thought". Maybe I'm lost.
- RC_ITR 3y agoI'm just saying that "thinking" is a well-defined class of related things that only animals do. I would argue expanding the definition to include the kind of things that semiconductors do really dilutes the meaning of "thinking" to be near meaningless. Maybe to put it succinctly - no computer has ever done anything without a human input (even if it's millions of layers abstracted), but thinking just happens spontaneously. If that's not a sufficient condition to differentiate 'thinking' from 'calculating,' then IDK what 'thinking' even means then.