4 ms·
Anybody can invent random problems ad nauseam - that doesn’t prove anything. I’m not claiming that it’s totally bullet proof, I never said that - I’m saying th
by malux85 3y ago
Anybody can invent random problems ad nauseam - that doesn’t prove anything.
I’m not claiming that it’s totally bullet proof, I never said that - I’m saying that if you had a kubernetes cluster anyway why not benefit from its abilities? Especially when the alternative is single node, single points of failure, which is clearly inferior.
The "what if the storage detaches" argument could easily apply to the single node VMs too, in which case the outcome would be a total system failure.
We are discussing the contrast between the articles architecture and running everything on K8s ... and I'm saying that running everything on K8s is clearly better
- jrockway 3y agoYeah, what happens when someone in AWS clicks "delete database" accidentally? It's the same thing that happens when K8s blows up in some weird way. You restore from your backup. (Fun fact: deleting the instance deletes the backups!)
- robertlagrant 3y agoAgain, I was replying to: > What happens in the article infra when the rabbitmq or database nodes fail?
- robertlagrant 3y ago> Anybody can invent random problems ad nauseam I agree; I was replying to this invented problem: > What happens in the article infra when the rabbitmq or database nodes fail? It makes sense if you read the reply as a reply.