> But only typedef the things themselves, not pointers to the things. I agree with this. One of the things I dislike about SDL_net, etc, is they do exactly wh

> But only typedef the things themselves, not pointers to the things. I agree with this. One of the things I dislike about SDL_net, etc, is they do exactly what you're describing. It's a pointer but they typedef it as if it's a value type. I understand the intent but imo that's very icky.