3 ms·
>You could tax everyone only $1 and use it exclusively for neonatal care and it would still be morally repugnant. I have to hand it too you for at least admitt
by lawlessone 3y ago
>You could tax everyone only $1 and use it exclusively for neonatal care and it would still be morally repugnant.
I have to hand it too you for at least admitting your views there.
>If taxes truly represent the will of the people, and people truly believe they are good, they would pay them even if not placed at gunpoint.
People aren't like that though. If they were , we wouldn't have car clamps.
I don't think you can argue a tax paying for neonatal care is repugnant and at that same time argue people will pay for what is good.
- sneak 3y agoThe difference is one of consent, which is what my example was constructed to illustrate. One is under threat, the other is voluntary.