3 ms·
Dr Lustig has been promoting this idea for many years. The problem is that he's doing it very unscientifically. He vastly overstates his evidence and makes clai
by driverdan 15y ago
Dr Lustig has been promoting this idea for many years. The problem is that he's doing it very unscientifically. He vastly overstates his evidence and makes claims of certainty that the science doesn't support.
I'm interested to see what replies his recent Nature publication receives.
- droithomme 15y agoYes, here's an article promoting this from last year: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/magazine/mag-17Sugar-t.html http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/magazine/mag-17Sugar-t.htm... And from earlier this year: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2094812/Sugar-controlled-like-tobacco-alcohol.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2094812/Sugar-cont...
- ars 15y agoHe starts by saying sugar and high fructose syrup are the same, then concludes by testing high fructose syrup and finding it's bad - but not testing sugar. His test does not support his conclusion.