2 ms·

That is one lens with which to view the situation. But it's a simple lens when inflation is a large forceful re-structuring of the economic pyramid that is impa

That is one lens with which to view the situation. But it's a simple lens when inflation is a large forceful re-structuring of the economic pyramid that is impacted by the attempts of central authorities to manage money. Inflation is just a word that we have for changes between the costs of various goods and services and the amount of money that people are being paid for the work they do (averaged across various parameters to make communication simple). Those changes happen for many reasons, because people aren't making enough money... because people are hording money... because the govt et al increase the supply of money to counteract those phenomena... because the economic chain of supply has shifted... and for some massive combination of all those things and more. The economy is a complex machination that you're deeply oversimplifying with this two sentence comment. Although the government trying to predict such things and get involved can be deeply flawed, the alternative is the crushing burden of unemployment and crumbling structures. As such, pointing the finger strongly at big government and saying "how dare you get involved" is myopic and heavy handed. We could also easily point the finger at the financiers and real-estate moguls who have brought us into a world where the average worker has little income and extreme "expenses" that filter into the coffers of wall street.

voisin 3y ago
> Although the government trying to predict such things and get involved can be deeply flawed, the alternative is the crushing burden of unemployment and crumbling structures. This is a little overstated, no? I agree the economy is more complicated than simply money supply, but subscribe to Hayek’s view of the pretence of knowledge - that the central bank can possibly manage the economy better than the economy can manage itself. The problem with a small elite managing the money supply is that it isn’t predictable. We see them saying rates will be low for the foreseeable future and then a few quarters later start jacking up interest rates at the fastest rate in 40 years. Well, I guess it just sucks to be anyone that listened to the “low for long” guidance. But this uncertainty has a cooling effect on economic activity. If anything we should trust money supply to a predictable, simple equation rather than the whims of men behind closed doors.

voisin 3y ago

> Although the government trying to predict such things and get involved can be deeply flawed, the alternative is the crushing burden of unemployment and crumbling structures. This is a little overstated, no? I agree the economy is more complicated than simply money supply, but subscribe to Hayek’s view of the pretence of knowledge - that the central bank can possibly manage the economy better than the economy can manage itself. The problem with a small elite managing the money supply is that it isn’t predictable. We see them saying rates will be low for the foreseeable future and then a few quarters later start jacking up interest rates at the fastest rate in 40 years. Well, I guess it just sucks to be anyone that listened to the “low for long” guidance. But this uncertainty has a cooling effect on economic activity. If anything we should trust money supply to a predictable, simple equation rather than the whims of men behind closed doors.