> 1. That completely ignores my first point, that engaging backend demos are inherently more difficult. :shrug: I guess? I don't really agree but don't really

> 1. That completely ignores my first point, that engaging backend demos are inherently more difficult. :shrug: I guess? I don't really agree but don't really see the validity in debating perceived difficulty. > 2. In nearly 20 years of doing this, I've never seen an org that got backend demos right, which to me says more about demos than it does about the organizations. Again, :shrug:, I have not experienced the difficulty you're describing across a wide range of companies and teams. > The word "demo" implies that you're going to see some live use of the thing, Maybe herein lies the problem? Because I don't agree with this statement at all, nor have my teams and companies. > No one wants to do "Power Point Presentation Driven Development" I do. I have. I will continue to, as I would call these "demos", and they continue to do well. Although I will add that I prefer jupyter notebooks to powerpoint for some types of demos.