3 ms·
I agree with this 100%. Maybe it was an attempt to ride the DSL fad that Rails ushered in, but it really feels like Scala incurs a lot of extra complexity to su
by cageface 15y ago
I agree with this 100%. Maybe it was an attempt to ride the DSL fad that Rails ushered in, but it really feels like Scala incurs a lot of extra complexity to support this feature. The Scala code I've written is pretty straightforward but I've made a point of resisting the temptation to build DSLs.