3 ms·
You're making a very interesting distinction between the experimental result, which is that antimatter follows the same space-time curve as normal matter, and t
by mnw21cam 3y ago
You're making a very interesting distinction between the experimental result, which is that antimatter follows the same space-time curve as normal matter, and the dashed hope of warp drives, which is that antimatter causes the same space-time curve as normal matter.
However, if antimatter were to create a negative curvature but follow positive curvature, then you would be able to put a lump of normal matter next to a lump of antimatter, connect the two together, and the whole mechanism would spontaneously accelerate forever, breaking the laws of conservation of energy and momentum. For that reason, I think this experiment also gives us high confidence that antimatter causes exactly the same space-time curvature as normal matter, even though we haven't gathered enough antimatter to see it creating a normal space-time curvature. In essence, gravity is symmetrical.
- stromgo 3y agoMaybe it helps to consider all 4 possibilities for the sign of the gravitational mass of antimatter, and the sign of the inertial mass of antimatter? (-,-): antimatter would fall down, but we could break conservation laws with a mechanism. (+,-): antimatter would fall up, but we could break conservation laws with a mechanism using electrically charged particles. (-,+): antimatter would fall up, but ruled out by the experiment. So what remains is (+,+)?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]