4 ms·
Right, a pseudoscience and here we have someone who won doing exclusively empirical work. Not sure how you match those two but keep at it
by VHRanger 3y ago
Right, a pseudoscience and here we have someone who won doing exclusively empirical work.
Not sure how you match those two but keep at it
- boxed 3y agoPlenty of people do empirical work in pseudoscience...
- glimshe 3y agoThere has been substantial amount of empirical work on remote seeing and telepathy, including some that "prove" them to be true.
- neaden 3y agoDoing a legitimate experiment on remote seeing for instance is by definition science, just like doing experiments trying to prove luminiferous ether were science back in the 19th century. Science is a methodology, not facts and something doesn't become science just because your hypothesis is correct or incorrect.
- SantalBlush 3y agoRight, the question is whether the hypothesis or theory is falsifiable, regardless of the subject matter. Economic theories are falisifable; we can see pretty clearly how much the theoretical models deviate from observation.