3 ms·
I’ve been tempted to ditch django for typescript in the backend but the sql and migrations story looks a bit … confusing and underwhelming? I feel like typeorm
by switch007 3y ago
I’ve been tempted to ditch django for typescript in the backend but the sql and migrations story looks a bit … confusing and underwhelming? I feel like typeorm should cover 99% of cases, due to its feature list and age (7 ish years…ancient!), but then you see people often recommending other projects (eg pg_typed). Do people just string things together? Make use of Liquibase?
In 2021 it seemed the TypeORM project was badly maintained and quite buggy - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26888369 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26888369 . Is that still the case?
- pritambarhate 3y agoWe have been using TypeORM for last 2 years now. Found it quite suitable for our use case. Didn't come across any big issue. But the projects we did with it where not very high scale. Less than 5 requests per second. So a single server affair.