3 ms·

Sorry but what the fuck are you talking about Framework has a 2256 by 1504 resolution with the last Intel processors and 55/61wh battery for the 13' version T

by Iulioh 3y ago

Sorry but what the fuck are you talking about Framework has a 2256 by 1504 resolution with the last Intel processors and 55/61wh battery for the 13' version The power hungry is debatable but that's not a framework problem, is an Intel problem Seems that not even HN is safe from Apple fan boys

hedora 3y ago
They did fix the screen (weren’t they 1080p before?) However, the battery kwh number is less than the tdp kw of any of the 13th gen intel processors, so it may as well just hibernate when unplugged. Also, I haven’t seen a reliable intel laptop for 12 years. However, the Ryzen tdp kw is 1/2-1/4 the battery kwh, so it probably gets a few hours under heavy load. I’d consider one, assuming the Linux taint bit is off. Do they run any of the BSD’s well?
- ilyt 3y ago
  > I’d consider one, assuming the Linux taint bit is off. Do they run any of the BSD’s well? Ah, obligatory "BSD user being a twat any time Linux is mentioned" comment
- Iulioh 3y ago
  >They did fix the screen (weren’t they 1080p before?) It never was >However, the battery kwh number is (low) Eh, that's pretty much the standard , even macs start with 52kw In some you see 72 and i don't really know how some companies can get 96 inside but hey >Also, I haven’t seen a reliable intel laptop for 12 years. There is nothing thst could change your mind
sneak 3y ago
1504 tall is low res in 2023. Even my iPad is 2048 pixels tall. For reference, 4K UHD is 3840x2160. The MBP16 is 3456x2234. > The power hungry is debatable but that's not a framework problem, is an Intel problem Nope, it would be my problem if I bought one.
- Iulioh 3y ago
  Not pro macbooks have 1600res (basically the same) Notebooks and tablets have different use case and distance they are used at And while i would like 4k on everything just because we can make 4k phone screens you can't pretend 16k on notebooks Because then i can shit on the mbp resolution because i can get a 4k dell

by Iulioh 3y ago

hedora 3y ago

They did fix the screen (weren’t they 1080p before?) However, the battery kwh number is less than the tdp kw of any of the 13th gen intel processors, so it may as well just hibernate when unplugged. Also, I haven’t seen a reliable intel laptop for 12 years. However, the Ryzen tdp kw is 1/2-1/4 the battery kwh, so it probably gets a few hours under heavy load. I’d consider one, assuming the Linux taint bit is off. Do they run any of the BSD’s well?

ilyt 3y ago
> I’d consider one, assuming the Linux taint bit is off. Do they run any of the BSD’s well? Ah, obligatory "BSD user being a twat any time Linux is mentioned" comment
Iulioh 3y ago
>They did fix the screen (weren’t they 1080p before?) It never was >However, the battery kwh number is (low) Eh, that's pretty much the standard , even macs start with 52kw In some you see 72 and i don't really know how some companies can get 96 inside but hey >Also, I haven’t seen a reliable intel laptop for 12 years. There is nothing thst could change your mind

sneak 3y ago

1504 tall is low res in 2023. Even my iPad is 2048 pixels tall. For reference, 4K UHD is 3840x2160. The MBP16 is 3456x2234. > The power hungry is debatable but that's not a framework problem, is an Intel problem Nope, it would be my problem if I bought one.

Iulioh 3y ago
Not pro macbooks have 1600res (basically the same) Notebooks and tablets have different use case and distance they are used at And while i would like 4k on everything just because we can make 4k phone screens you can't pretend 16k on notebooks Because then i can shit on the mbp resolution because i can get a 4k dell