2 ms·
You’re going to perpetually spend on crime caused by junkies, it’s serious financial burden on the healthcare system and a social burden on families. You’re muc
by huytersd 3y ago
You’re going to perpetually spend on crime caused by junkies, it’s serious financial burden on the healthcare system and a social burden on families. You’re much better off spending a fraction of that money on rehab.
- ddd00001 3y ago[dead]
- trogdor 3y agoTreatment works best when people are motivated to get clean. It doesn’t work when they are not. Moreover, the likelihood of good long-term outcomes decreases dramatically when addiction is comorbid with other serious mental illness. Sadly, I don’t believe that most mentally ill, homeless addicts are going to get better. It’s a terrible situation, and I don’t know of a solution. I don’t think anyone does. I would also note that most rehab facilities for substance use disorders espouse an abstinence-based approach to treatment. That approach simply doesn’t work. The standard of care for opioid use disorder is medication assisted treatment, which is both evidence-based and far more effective than abstinence-based programs. The difference in outcomes is stark, particularly since dropout often results in death. Bottom line, though, from my perspective: you can’t effectively treat people unless and until they are motivated to enter into and engage with a treatment program. “Junkies” of the type you describe rarely fit that bill. Drug courts are a good step in the right direction, but they need to take a more evidence-based approach to their operations. I wish there was an easy solution to this problem, but there isn’t.