3 ms·
I was a contributor to a small Linux desktop application ages ago. We absolutely had a regular flow of hapless users who installed the Debian-provided package a
by jamesgeck0 3y ago
I was a contributor to a small Linux desktop application ages ago. We absolutely had a regular flow of hapless users who installed the Debian-provided package and reported bugs that either never existed in upstream builds or had been fixed months before. I believe the situation was that Debian had packaged an obsolete version of the software for stable because of a misunderstanding of the versioning system. When upstream discovered the mistake and contacted them, they refused to update it to a modern version. Instead, they requested that we maintain their fork and backport literal years of fixes.
This situation resulted in Debian distributing a broken version of our software for several years. I did not come away with positive impressions of their packaging processes.
- rlpb 3y ago> because of a misunderstanding of the versioning system > ... > I did not come away with positive impressions of their packaging processes I am not coming away with positive impressions of your upstream versioning or release processes :)
- lproven 3y agoThis was the core of JWZ's famous complaint about Debian bundling an out of date xscreensaver. I won't link to it, as he blocks links coming from here...