3 ms·
* on the JVM Right? Flatbuffers supposedly being slower than protobufs is circumspect since most benchmarks I’ve seen for it in C++/Rust show it outperforming,
by vlovich123 3y ago
* on the JVM
Right? Flatbuffers supposedly being slower than protobufs is circumspect since most benchmarks I’ve seen for it in C++/Rust show it outperforming, especially since it too does zero-copy deser.
- chaokunyang 3y agoYes, on the jvm. Haven't tested it for native languages, C++/Rust should be faster since it doesn't compress data and it's zero-copy