3 ms·
Not for shooting it down, but for possessing a weapon as a felon (he admitted to having shot it down and thus being in possession of a weapon).
by ThePowerOfFuet 3y ago
Not for shooting it down, but for possessing a weapon as a felon (he admitted to having shot it down and thus being in possession of a weapon).
- tmm84 3y agoEven if he was legally allowed to have said firearm they would have got him for something else I’m sure. I wonder though, as a civilian how do I tell the difference between a law enforcement drone and the drone of Joe citizen?