2 ms·

How does Fury compare to static schema serialization frameworks that aren’t Java focused? For example, flat buffers, alkahest, protobuf etc.

• chaokunyang 3y ago
  Compared with protobuf, fury is 3.2x faster. When comparing with avro, fury is 5.3x faster. Compared with flatbuffers, fury is 4.8x faster. See https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki for detailed benchmark data
  • vlovich123 3y ago
    * on the JVM Right? Flatbuffers supposedly being slower than protobufs is circumspect since most benchmarks I’ve seen for it in C++/Rust show it outperforming, especially since it too does zero-copy deser.
    • chaokunyang 3y ago
      Yes, on the jvm. Haven't tested it for native languages, C++/Rust should be faster since it doesn't compress data and it's zero-copy