2 ms·
Given it's a binary serialization framework, it should not be too difficult, because the domain is well-explored and numerous libraries exist in C# which addres
by neonsunset 3y ago
Given it's a binary serialization framework, it should not be too difficult, because the domain is well-explored and numerous libraries exist in C# which address same goals that Fury does.
More popular/newer examples are https://github.com/Cysharp/MemoryPack https://github.com/Cysharp/MemoryPack (which is similar to Fury with its own spec, C#-code first schema), https://github.com/MessagePack-CSharp/MessagePack-CSharp https://github.com/MessagePack-CSharp/MessagePack-CSharp or even gRPC / Protobuf tooling https://github.com/grpc/grpc-dotnet https://github.com/grpc/grpc-dotnet
- chaokunyang 3y agoGlad to see those great libraries. Can't wait to make fury support c#. One of the biggest difference for fury is that if support circular/shared reference and polymorphism. It's different from many other libraries.