There seems to be some (understandable) confusion in some of the comments about what the article here is reporting which isn't helped by a lack of clarity in it

There seems to be some (understandable) confusion in some of the comments about what the article here is reporting which isn't helped by a lack of clarity in it or the underlying Guardian piece, possibly in each case intended to push their own agendas. There appears to be an interpretation here by some of a potentially unsafe verdict due to misreading of statistics in her conviction - which has certainly happened in the past in other cases including those mentioned. The expert input here though is intended as advice for the inquiry into what went wrong at the places Letby worked to lessen the risk of it happening again. That necessarily includes qualified and responsible analyses of statistics, which will also have the benefit of increasing protection and support of staff as well as improving safety generally.