5 ms·

Fury is also the fastest jvm serialization framework in the https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki

• marginalia_nu 3y ago
  Weird they aren't emphasizing competitiveness with Protobuf and Avro, which is what I'd look at long before java serialization if I wanted fast object serialization.
  • chaokunyang 3y ago
    Protobuf/Avro doesn't support polymorphism and circular references, maybe that's one of thge reason? But even compared with protobuf, fury is 3.2x faster. When comparing with avro, fury is 5.3x faster
    • TeeWEE 3y ago
      How can this be faster than Protobuf? Protobuf basically does a direct storage of bytestream to memory. No parsing needed because it precompiled the stubs. Theoretically it can’t be much faster. And having an IDL is an advantage imho. Clear specs and interface design.
      • chaokunyang 3y ago
        Not exactly. Protobuf has compression for string/numbers. Fury use different compression protocol. Another thing is that Protobuf generated code are not efficient enough. Fury generated the code at runtime, which has more information about the jvm, then it can genereate more eifficient code, avoid many memory access, branchs, and do more code optimization.