4 ms·
Oh sure - call it “cognitive homeostasis” or something like that, as a baseline thing. But I do think we socialize people to be obstinate, for a variety of rea
by RangerScience 3y ago
Oh sure - call it “cognitive homeostasis” or something like that, as a baseline thing.
But I do think we socialize people to be obstinate, for a variety of reasons and in a variety of ways, some of which are:
1) How often has someone told you what to do, and been more right, versus times they’ve been more wrong, or missing something about your situation, or lying about their motivations and goals, such that what they were telling you wasn’t actually what you should do?
2) Totally makes sense to me that towns, etc, would have a history of the central authority showing up and saying “change like this”, and only awhile later finding out why that was bad for them.
3) AFAIK, most of the time the experience a town would have with a central authority is that authority showing up to take something the town doesn’t want to give.
So you put all that together, and it makes sense to me that people would resist something like centralized time keeping “just because”.
- bruce511 3y agoOf course there are plenty of bad interactions. And yes, we'll remember and weight the bad long after we forget the good. If you see life as a zero sum game, then you are primed to distrust everyone and everything. This mistrust is often well-placed. The inability to separate good suggestions from bad ones though is a flaw. Some can be objectively good, perhaps more easily seen by a neutral outsider, and yet still be fought against. Because if we're not fighting then we're fools?