4 ms·
It may sound like that, but let's assume positive intentions. This person might wanted to point out that the people who argue about the bill (which is certainl
by serial_dev 3y ago
It may sound like that, but let's assume positive intentions.
This person might wanted to point out that the people who argue about the bill (which is certainly not 1.5B people), can't escape from and leave behind their mental prison of casteism, and they import a new form of racism into the US, which is not ideal.
- belltaco 3y agoI mean they're openly advocating deporting them for legal free speech, not even a dog whistle. I would imagine a good chunk are US citizens. While not fully understanding all the nuances.
- sachislife 3y ago> but let's assume positive intentions. This TMWNN person is literally saying this about this entire matter >> When children get into a fight, adults intervene by separating the combatants and sending them home regardless of who is "right" They actually see themselves as the "adult" and this matter as a children's fight even though its been ongoing for several hundred years prior to Columbus ever set sail to find India and accidentally found TMWNN's america. And as the other commenter noted, this person has also argued in favor of deportation and blanket censorship on discussing caste matters. I don't think its fair to continue assuming postive intentions at this point. If not racist, they are extremely condescending at the very least.