> How do 'we' know that? This particular law came about in response to a suit against Cisco iirc in which a significant problem was "is caste discrimination il

> How do 'we' know that? This particular law came about in response to a suit against Cisco iirc in which a significant problem was "is caste discrimination illegal" that led to the case being dismissed. Or you could do a fairly quickly search on twitter or mastodon for many people talking about how they directly experienced caste based discrimination. A person I followed talked about how that discrimination occurred until they married a "higher" caste person and suddenly semi-regular questions about how they got to the US, how they could get their job, etc disappeared when they took their partner's name. > You're also losing business and violating laws. You're only violating laws if the discrimination is illegal. You aren't losing business as we're talking about people you're actively choosing to discriminate against, if anything you're being forced to accept more business, not less.