4 ms·

> I don't want to have one process per request, so the obvious thing was to use something asynchronous There's these amazing things called threads you can use

by bascule 15y ago

> I don't want to have one process per request, so the obvious thing was to use something asynchronous There's these amazing things called threads you can use too

StavrosK 15y ago
Why would I do that when 99% of the time is spent waiting on the http call to return?
- bascule 15y ago
  Because unless you have an unusually high (>1000) concurrency level for your HTTP connections, threads are a more than adequate solution to the problem.