4 ms·
If they are being paid a generous pension, I can’t see why it’s unreasonable we expect them to simply be retired.
by catgary 3y ago
If they are being paid a generous pension, I can’t see why it’s unreasonable we expect them to simply be retired.
- maximilianburke 3y agoBecause three star and four star tanks are temporary, officers will retire at the end of their term to finish their career as that highest rank, rather than revert to a two star rank until they are required by law to retire. But the type of person who makes it that far isn’t going to be the type of person who wants to stay idle for long, especially if they are still feeling pretty young.
- rendaw 3y agoThere are two, conflicting images being painted in this thread. 1. Poor generals who can't do anything other than military need these cush jobs or else they'd be out on the streets. 2. Generals are energetic and capable and would want to try something new even with a pension. If they have enough energy to not stay idle, then certainly they don't need these arms jobs? If they're worn out and can't do anything else, then we should give them pensions enough so they don't feel forced to work for arms manufacturers.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]