4 ms·
If you are going to aggregate all the tax cuts going back to 2000, you could also aggregate all the spending increases. I don’t think either is a reasonable thi
by bradleyjg 3y ago
If you are going to aggregate all the tax cuts going back to 2000, you could also aggregate all the spending increases. I don’t think either is a reasonable thing to do.
The OP article includes this paragraph:
“Getting the debt under control will require taking a serious look at health care, Social Security and the tax code,” CRFB president Maya MacGuineas said in a news release.
which mentions taxes.
I don’t see what the big problem is with specifically mentioning the ARPA given how absolutely enormous it was. My objection wouldn’t have been not mentioning specific tax cuts, but instead not mentioning CARES which was even larger at $2.2 trillion.