5 ms·
Yeah that’s the whole problem really. It’s not arbitrary land they’re fighting over. It’s that land and it can be no other land. I don’t know how it resolves in
by nemo44x 3y ago
Yeah that’s the whole problem really. It’s not arbitrary land they’re fighting over. It’s that land and it can be no other land. I don’t know how it resolves in any way we find tasteful by modern standards.
- hackerlight 3y agoMoreover, even if the land wasn't perceived to be special, you can't uproot an entire society without forced ethnic cleansing. It is impossible to get all X million people to agree to that without force.
- vel0city 3y agoYeah right? Like you could gift either side the equivalent or even double acerage of California or some other prime real estate in the Mediterranean or anywhere else on the planet and it wouldn't make a difference, God wills each side to have that land, each one has ancestors who laid claim to those specific hills for hundreds of years.
- AlexCoventry 3y agoThe original Zionists were more pragmatic than that. Herzl was considering Uganda at one point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda_Scheme#%22A_very_land_for_Dr._Herzl%22 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda_Scheme#%22A_very_land_f...
- 2rsf 3y agoAccording to a podcast I recently listened to this is not entirely accurate. Herzl did consider Uganda, but not too seriously and it is assumed that he used it to raise support for the idea of a national jewish home and not to actually go there.