I like the discussions, but the idea of 'smartest' is dumb, for people to be pondering. There are original singular ideas/proofs which shake our world, such as

I like the discussions, but the idea of 'smartest' is dumb, for people to be pondering. There are original singular ideas/proofs which shake our world, such as Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Each such case is incomparable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_... This particular article may as well as said IQ, which is biased nonsense: > Implicit in this definition of intelligence is general knowledge. Why is this requirement there? So that this most intelligent being is still "like us"?