6 ms·
In many jurisdictions, requiring uncompensated oncall would, by itself, possibly be "constructive dismissal". PIPing without an actual performance problem is a
by avidiax 3y ago
In many jurisdictions, requiring uncompensated oncall would, by itself, possibly be "constructive dismissal".
PIPing without an actual performance problem is also constructive dismissal, and doing it because the employee is refusing a change is possibly retaliation.
Realistically, in the U.S. at least, there's very little risk that the employer will get sued, but it's still shitty and will eventually bite the employer if they get into a habit of this.
- knallfrosch 3y agoThe people you have will quit and the people you hire want to be compensated just as the others. So firing really isn't an option, unless you think you're overpaying your current staff and can get the same quality cheaper.